Complaints Resolution Panel
View the Code
  Tuesday 7 September 2010
Contact Home

Complaints Register

Date: 21/01/10
Code: 2009-10-009
Product: Swisse Ultiboost Eye
Complainant: Blackmores Ltd
Respondent: Swisse Vitamins Pty Ltd
Finding: Justified
Sections Found Justified: Act section 22(5); Code section 5(2)
Sections Found Not Justified: None
Action: Withdraw advertisement; withdraw representations
Panel Determination:

COMPLAINTS RESOLUTION PANEL DETERMINATION

 

Complaint 2009-10-009 Swisse Ultiboost Eye

 

Meeting held 21 January 2010

 

 

Complaint summary

 

Complainant

 

Blackmores Ltd

 

Advertiser

 

Swisse Vitamins Pty Ltd

 

Subject matter of complaint

 

Website advertisement

 

Type of determination

 

Final

 

Sections of the Code, Regulations or Act found to have been breached*

 

Act section 22(5)

Code section 5(2)

 

Sections of the Code, Regulations or Act found not to have been breached*

 

None

 

Sanctions

 

 

Withdrawal of advertisement

Withdrawal of representations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* only sections of the Code, Act, or Regulations that were part of the complaint or were raised by the Panel are listed
The advertisement(s)

 

1.      The complaint concerned an internet advertisement published at the website www.swisse.com.au.

2.      The advertisement included the words “recommended for people who experience problems with vision or as a preventative to maintain healthy eyes and provided vital antioxidants to help protect against degenerative eye conditions such as macular degeneration and cataracts”.

3.      An excerpt of the advertisement can be viewed in the relevant Appendix to this determination.

The product(s)

 

4.      The advertisement promoted the product Swisse Ultiboost Eye.

The advertiser(s)

 

5.      The advertiser was Swisse Vitamins Pty Ltd.

The complaint

 

6.      The complainant was Blackmores Ltd, a commercial competitor of the advertiser.

7.      The complainant alleged that the advertisement breached section 22(5) of the Act and section 5(2) of the Code.

The advertiser’s response to the complaint

 

8.      The advertiser acknowledged the alleged breaches and stated that the relevant material had been removed from the website.

9.      The advertiser provided a copy of revised text from the website.

Findings of the Panel

 

10.  As a preliminary matter, it should be noted that the Panel did not review the revised text provided by the advertiser and that this determination makes no finding as to whether that revised text complies with the Code.

11.  Section 5(2) of the Code prohibits advertisements that “refer, expressly or by implication, to serious forms of diseases, conditions, ailments or defects specified in Part 2 of Appendix 6, unless prior approval is given under the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989.” The diseases and conditions specified in Part 2 of Appendix 6 of the Code include “serious forms of” a wide range of health concerns.

12.  Section 22(5) of the Act states that sponsors of therapeutic goods “must not, by any means, advertise the goods for an indication other than those accepted in relation to the inclusion of the goods in the Register”.

13.  As the advertiser acknowledged, the advertisement breached these provisions.

Sanctions

 

14.  The Panel requests Swisse Vitamins Pty Ltd, in accordance with subregulation 42ZCAI(1) of the Therapeutic Goods Regulations 1990:

a)      to withdraw the advertisement from further publication;

b)      to withdraw any representations relating to serious eye conditions including macular degeneration, visual impairment, cataracts, treatment of eye damage, prevention of degenerative eye conditions, and blindness, together with any other representations falling outside the Listed indications for the advertised product;

c)      not to use the representations in (b) above in any other advertisement unless Swisse Vitamins Pty Ltd satisfies the Panel that the use of the representation would not result in a contravention of the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989, the Therapeutic Goods Regulations 1990 or the Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code;

d)     where the representation has been provided to other parties such as retailers or website publishers, and where there is a reasonable likelihood that the representation has been published or is intended to be published by such parties, to advise those parties that the representation(s) should be withdrawn;; and,

e)      within 14 days of being notified of this request, to provide evidence to the Panel of its compliance, including a response in writing that they will comply with the Panel’s sanctions, and where appropriate, supporting material such as copies of instructions to advertising agents or publishers, or correspondence with retailers and other third party advertisers.

15.  The advertiser’s attention is drawn to the provisions of sub-regulations 42ZCAI(3) and (4) which permit the Panel to make recommendations to the Secretary in the event of non-compliance with this request, including a recommendation that the inclusion of the goods on the Register be cancelled.

Dated 7 April 2010

For the Panel

 

Jason Korke

Chairman


Appendix A:    Definitions

 

In this determination, unless otherwise specified:

a)      “the Act” means the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989;

b)      “the Regulations” means the Therapeutic Goods Regulations 1990;

c)      “the Code” means the Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code;

d)     “the Register” means the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods;

e)      “any other advertisement” appearing in sub-regulation 42ZCA1(1)(d) is not confined to advertisements in specified or broadcast media (in relation to which complaints may be made to the Panel under Regulation 42ZCAB).


Appendix B:     Excerpt of the Advertisement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisement Copy: Download

Back...